In order to reach the multiculturalists I ought to be writing this column standing on my head. Their world is turned upside down. Especially when it comes to the use of the word “racism”. The opportunism, intellectual dishonesty and sheer idiocy with which they use the word are mindboggling.
But I have come to the sad conclusion that any acrobatics from my side, apart from being somewhat impractical, also would be utterly futile. The multiculturalists are beyond therapeutic reach.
I have sensed this for a long time, but the reactions from the multiculturalist utopians to the failed attempt to shoot and kill Lars Hedegaard has left me with no doubt. If one disregards the liturgical condemnations of the would-be-assassin and read between the lines, one is saddened.
A vast majority of mainstream media and pundits, in Sweden every media without exception, focused only on the target’s alleged “Islamophobic” agenda and almost none “failed” to mention Hedegaard’s hate-speech conviction from the lower Danish court with several of them “forgetting” to tell about his 7-0 acquittal for racism in the Supreme Court.
What a dishonest way to communicate. The hidden message is clear: Hedegaard had this coming to him; the racist is reaping what he sowed!
To the proponents of multiculturalism in the regimented media, there is not a trace of doubt that Lars Hedegaard is indeed a racist. Just as Geert Wilders and the late Pim Fortuyn. And just as all the rest of us, who consider relativistic multiculturalism to be stillborn, and for that reason are deeply concerned by the utterly irresponsible immigration of welfare refugees from the Muslim world unable to integrate into our society, a result of the breach of contract that our elected politicians have perpetuated for the last 30 or so years.
There is just one major problem with this narrative. It is blatantly false, since a vast majority of the internationally known outspoken anti-jihadists are worried and deeply democratic people. I have met a number of them. It is a mixed group consisting of conservatives, libertarians, religious Christians, Muslim apostates. You name it. And you know what? They have without exception been decent people and as racist as the cup of coffee standing in front of me right now!
The fact of the matter is that the word “racist” has become meaningless. An opportunistic card used to disqualify and delegitimize your opponents. In Europe backed up with hopelessly asymmetrical “hate speech” laws, where you can be convicted for statements that are true!
But not only is the narrative about the racist Islamophobes false, it also inverts reality, since the real racism thrives amongst the very critics of the anti-jihadist.
The definition of modern day racism can be described as a composite of prejudice, xenophobia and genuine racism.
Prejudices we all harbor. That is an unavoidable part of life, as they are based on ignorance, lack of knowledge and meme-like stereotypes. We all know that Jews are clever but greedy, Scotsmen stingy, blondes are stupid and English women straight-out ugly. Right?
Fear of the stranger, called “xenophobia”, is also a natural part of the human condition. This is a Darwinian inheritance, which, due to improvements in transportation, education, television and Internet has been rapidly diminishing for generations. But it is true that it is now on the rise again among the socially marginalized groups in Europe.
The resurgence of xenophobia has one cause, and one cause only: irresponsible immigration. Neither the poor Greek nor the Danish welfare client was particularly xenophobic before seeing his prospects or subsidies vanish, due to strangers who do not like him, his daughter, his country, his religion, his entire culture.
Genuine racism occurs when prejudice and xenophobia meet low self-esteem. This rarely happens, although in particular the poor ethnic Europeans could easily move to that group if the Islamization of Europe continues.
The multiculturalists use these words interchangeably; usually with the intent of demonizing their opponents, equally frequently to present themselves as the Good Human. They are cultural relativists, whose worldview is based on a false axiom, on the perverted premise that all cultures are equally valuable.
This short-circuiting of the mind strangely leads to an inability or unwillingness to distinguish between criticism of belief systems and criticism of individuals.
By not applying this very fundamental distinction, these relativists reach the conclusion that if one despises a culture or an ideology, one necessarily also despises people coming from this culture or who believe in this ideology. This is broken logic at its worst.
That I, with all my intellectual capacity, despise the tribal culture, the concepts of honor and the belief system that has dominated the Arabic world for 1400 years, obviously does not imply that I hold a grudge against individuals who have suffered the bad luck of being born into this failed civilization.
Just how hard is this to understand?
Nobody is master of where or by whom he is given life. No newborn child is of higher value than another newborn child. Regardless of ethnicity or religion. If one were to think otherwise, one would be a racist.
The German SS soldiers who without hesitation hammered Jewish babies against walls in order to save bullets were racists. The Jew was an inferior human being. Inferior humans compared to the Aryan. Could there be anyone, within EXPO or Antifa (Scandinavian leftwing multiculturalists and anti-racists (sic!)), who truly believes that “Islamophobes” such as Lars Hedegaard and like-minded people have a similar attitude towards Muslims?
I do not hate the second-generation immigrants who are running around the streets of Europe doing the Hitler salute. I feel pity for them. I would wish that as many of them as humanly possible could be integrated into our superior Western culture.
The unintegrated — and unfortunately that is a very significant percentage — are wasting the single life they have been granted on Earth in cultivating hatred for the infidels. The kuffars. A racist hatred that is a part of their identity, a part of their tribal culture, but first and foremost a part of their religion, building upon the Koran, which – quite factually – is full of racist statements.
Thus, the real racism unfortunately comes from your camp, EXPO and Antifa. Muslim immigration has led to a dramatic increase in hate crimes, targeting Jews and homosexuals in particular, as well as an unknown number of honor killings of poor Muslim girls seeking to escape the social control that is an integral part of their gloomy cultural inheritance.
Overall, the Islamic view on women is so disgusting that it defies my intellectual comprehension that the left wing does not lead the battle against Islamism. For this is genuine racism, targeting half the Earth’s population.
And you – EXPO and Antifa – you are expressing soft racism; the “racism of low expectations” that leads you to treat Muslim immigrants as if they were stupid children. Like fools unable to cope with our superior Western societies, inferior people who for that reason do not have the same obligations as the indigenous population
This paradigm is unshakable in its cultural Marxist interpretation. One cannot expect anything from these victims of Western imperialism. Thus, in the nature of things, one must not place demands on them.
This racist mentality has proven a disaster, as it creates a barrier to an integration already bordering on the impossible, because it has served to increase the culture of offense and victimhood already present among immigrants long before their arrival here.
This column is probably entirely wasted on the cultural relativists. I am already considered an “Islamophobe”. They can thus join hands with their best friends and exclaim:
”You are a racist, Kuffar!”