Genocidal multiculturalism

Thou Shalt Not Criticise – or else

Angela Merkel, David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy have all bitten the Politically Correct (PC) bullet and declared multiculturalism to be a failure. Hot on their heels comes Britain’s Labour Party leader Ed Miliband who, although not quite denouncing multiculturalism, has at least accepted that his party’s immigration policy whilst in power was “wrong.”

Mr Miliband, however, failed to address certain aspects of mass immigration. Rather than focusing on third world immigration he chose to highlight the problem of EU immigration only. Red Ed is clearly concerned that those pesky Poles will bring unacceptable levels of ideological baggage into Britain, courtesy of their historically valid suspicion of Socialism; their enviable work ethic and their deep belief in Christianity.

Of the possible drawbacks of mass Islamic immigration we heard not a word. This deafening silence is also notable from Angela Merkel et al. Having been told multiculturalism had failed, Europe’s respective electorates were subsequently glued to their media outlets to hear a natural expansion on this, but rather predictably no further elucidation came.

I rather suspect the initial denouncement of multiculturalism was simply done to curry favour with a disillusioned and wavering electorate drifting toward the perceived “far-right” parties that are gaining ground all over Europe. I further suspect our liberal elites don’t actually think multiculturalism has failed at all. In fact, I would suggest the divisive ideology of multiculturalism has been a wonderful success in the eyes of the liberal/left political class.

Multiculturalism claims all cultures are of equal validity and that no one religion can claim superiority over another. Any dissident who objects to this ideology runs the risk of losing his/her livelihood or even being prosecuted for “thought-crime”, which has been renamed today as Hate Crime.

This is all well and good if applied to all people regardless of their skin colour or religion, but sadly it is not. Native Europeans are constantly encouraged to think of themselves and their history with guilt and only guilt. We were slave traders, racists, murderers, imperialists and oppressors. If our present-day attitudes fail to conform to the varied doctrines of PC multiculturalism, then we are labelled bigots, xenophobes, Islamophobes and fascists.

For the non-indigenous newcomers to the West, multiculturalism is completely different. Their traditions, cultures and religions are emphasised in a positive light only. Their present day contribution “enriches” our otherwise stale societies; their diversity is celebrated and history’s most violent, anti-Semitic, supremacist and misogynistic ideology – which is both political as well as religious – is fanatically promoted as a female-friendly religion of peace which Thou Shalt Not Criticise.

There are two ways of looking at multiculturalism. The first is the charitable view, where the ideology is deemed a necessary precondition in order to advance the liberal/left vision of peaceful and harmonious communities co-existing in some sort of multi-ethnic nirvana.

The second and somewhat less charitable view is that multiculturalism is a state-sanctioned tool used to encourage division to an extent that amounts to Apartheid; to destroy the Nation State; to politically and mentally disarm the native and indigenous populations and to ensure the total breakdown of civil society. Such an inevitable and anarchic situation could only then be countered by more and more rules and regulations, leading eventually to full totalitarian rule of a socialist bent – a slow-motion revolution as it were.

I take the less charitable viewpoint, a position adopted not because of some innate prejudice, but more of an “après-judice” if you will. In other words, I have closely studied the ideology and the people who promote it, before coming to the only conclusion possible – which is that multiculturalism is both sinister and evil, and unless rapidly thwarted is quite capable of utterly destroying the people of the Western world.

Ed Miliband’s Labour Party, for example, hates traditional Britain, what with all those indigenous, semi-Christian, conservative capitalists going about their loathsome business of wealth creation and non-dependence on the Socialist State. Andrew Neather, who was a speech writer for Tony Blair, actually admitted the reason for promoting mass immigration and multiculturalism was to “rub the noses of the right in diversity.”

Peter Sutherland is another member of the traitor class who actively promotes mass immigration and multiculturalism. Unfortunately for us, he is also the United Nation’s Special Representative for Migration and Development. His words are therefore quite capable of being backed up by deeds, and his words are very troubling indeed.

Mr Sutherland believes the Nation States of Europe must be “de-homogenised” in order for the EU to realise its political ambitions. He fully understands that the combination of mass immigration and multiculturalism cannot fail to achieve this aim. What Mr Sutherland chooses to disregard is that Europe’s indigenous peoples will be destroyed as well. I believe this contravenes several articles within the UN’s definition of genocide.

Under the edicts of multiculturalism, native Europeans are rendered shameful, guilty, faithless, disunited and weak, whilst Muslims are made to feel proud, united, faithful and strong. If demographics and multicultural apartheid continue along their present paths then there will inevitably come a day when comparable numbers of the proud, fanatical and strong will confront the guilty, faithless and weak.

There can only be one outcome if this happens. We can do little about the demographics, but we can certainly expose multiculturalism as a totalitarian ideology of racial and cultural genocide. Only once this is accepted by the electoral majority can we begin to reclaim Western Civilisation.

Paul Weston is Chairman of the British Freedom Party.

Swedish, Danish